A bit of a rant about astrology (as well as religion) from James Randi…
It was not only the specific, simplistic, error of a geocentric universe that brought about the notion of astrology, but the conviction that our species was so special that the universe was created and designed solely for its benefit. In other words, astrology was the result of those religious aberrations from which many of our fellow passengers on Earth, still suffer. Why would the stars ó both fixed and wandering ó exist at all, if not for the use and appreciation of our species? After all, all other life-forms were created for our use, either as food or slaves or to clothe us, and our only obligation is to continuously cajole and fawn over this petulant Creator God, who might remind us of a selfish, capricious, child, but who is capable of visiting pain, disease, and despair upon us at a whim ó and frequently does so if we try to really apply thought to the situation. Thus, the possibility that this juvenile despot might have laid out some secrets in the patterns of the night sky, could not be ignored, because in admiring and surrendering to its glory, brownie points might be available…
And yes, I posted today. Make of that what you will. (Mainly I just didn’t want to forget to post this lovely bit of quotage later. Mystery solved. Oh well.)
Comments
One response to “Or, in other words, astrology is kinda goofy”
I like this rant from James Randi. I tell ya what. I have never understood, in all the years I’ve studied religion. Why people want to believe in a version of God that is no more then a spoiled petulant child. The whole slave/master feel of some religions just makes me cold.