Author: Karel Kerezman

  • Dorothy and Toto Not Invited

    I’m heading to The Emerald City this weekend to visit with distant friends. I have clothes, allergy medicines, toiletries, snacks and amusements prepped and packed. There’s no doubt that I’ll forget to pack something I actually want or need, but I’m reasonably certain that I have the basics covered.

    This is my first chance to get (and stay) out of town in quite some time. I hope for a reasonably relaxing and enjoyable couple of days. I also, of course, hope that Amtrak doesn’t screw things up more than they already have.

    Be good, and I’ll see you next week.

  • To Two Too

    The WordPress sites here have been updated to version 2.2.2.

    [audio:muchrejoicing.mp3]

    A more substantive post is scheduled for tomorrow. Don’t miss it!

  • If nothing else, at least I started my day smiling.

    Happiness is… receiving two text messages on my phone within thirty seconds of one another, one each from two of my favorite people, letting me know that they’d bumped into one other unexpectedly at one of the downtown Starbucks locations. (With as many of those one can find in Portland, the odds against this are higher than you might think.) As in, one was standing in line right behind the other. Serendipity at its finest, I think.

    It’s the simple things that can turn an otherwise-drab morning into something quite a bit more tolerable, no?

  • The what is a what, again?

    I spotted a bumper sticker the other day. It informed me that, “The death penalty is a hate crime.” Well now. Let’s think about that for a moment, purely from a semantic point of view.

    The death penalty is the product of a process involving judges, lawyers and juries. The judge is supposedly impartial, the lawyers are in it either for principle or for money, and the jury is a bunch of people who have a collective blend of loves, hates and prejudices. Delivering a death sentence is a process constrained by a complex series of laws.

    I wonder, then, where is the hate and where is the crime? We’re talking about a legal (read: “made of laws, therefore not a crime”) process that’s had most of the humanity squeezed out of it to begin with (so, there’s no more hate involved than any other emotion one could name).

    Go ahead and disagree with the death penalty in principle if you see fit, but framing the argument in terms that don’t even make sense in the context isn’t going to help your cause. It just makes people like me shake our heads in bewilderment.

    (Please note that I’m not looking for a debate on the merits of the death penalty itself. It’s the message’s phrasing itself that concerned me. Call me crazy if you must.)

  • My Lucky Card

    Here’s an amusing bit of luck for you: This morning on the way in to work I stopped at the Starbucks for my usual hot cocoa and a pastry. (I normally get one of the breakfast sandwiches, but I try not to get stuck in that rut.) The total came to four dollars and eighty cents. I knew that my refillable card had somewhere in the vicinity of five dollars left, so I had the cashier give it a swipe just to see what would happen.

    Imagine my surprise to see the receipt which read that my card, after completing the purchase, had zero dollars and zero cents remaining!

    Neat, huh? Now if only I could translate that kind of luck into something involving serious amounts of cash…

  • My address is my passport. Verify me.

    I was almost asleep and then remembered that I wanted to get this posted before it slipped my mind completely.

    Related to an earlier disaster regarding certain bank accounts, today I uncovered another slightly smaller disaster. During the process of getting things remedied, the customer support representative on the phone needed to verify that I am who I say I am. The bank’s preferred method of doing so, apparently, involves asking a series of multiple choice questions. Today I got the “addresses you’ve used before” quiz set. As this was being explained to me I stated confidently that I’ve only moved twice in the last decade so it shouldn’t be too much of a challenge.

    Yep. I opened my big mouth again. You’d think I’d know better by now: The instant I make a definitive statement I’m proven wrong almost immediately.

    The first question went back to the heady days of my early marriage. The second question was a trick, as none of the presented multiple-choice options were valid. For the third, they went back to my earliest days as a semi-independent functional adult person. It’s a good thing I remembered the street names or I might’ve had a much more difficult time getting today’s crisis settled!

    I hasten to point out, mind you, that I’m very grateful that policies are in place to verify that the person who calls Washington Mutual to monkey around with my account is actually Me and not just some random identity thief who was able to learn my SSN and DOB. I highly approve of this sort of protective policy in general.